standard model
n.
A model of fundamental forces and particles that explains their behavior and interactions in terms of symmetries and the destruction of symmetries.
|
Results for standard model
|
On this page:
|
A model of fundamental forces and particles that explains their behavior and interactions in terms of symmetries and the destruction of symmetries.
The theory that explains the three major interactions of elementary particle physics—the strong interaction responsible for nuclear forces, the weak interaction responsible for radioactive decay, and the electromagnetic interaction—in terms of a common physical picture. The model for this picture is quantum electrodynamics, the fundamental theory underlying electromagnetism. In that theory, electrons, viewed as structureless elementary constituents of matter, interact with photons, structureless elementary particles of light. The standard model extends quantum electrodynamics to explain all three interactions of subnuclear physics in terms of similar basic constituents. See also Electron;
For more information on standard model, visit Britannica.com.
An intended or natural model of a theory. A non-standard model of a mathematical theory is one which is not isomorphic with the intended or natural model (See skolem paradox).
The best theory of the ultimate nature of matter available today. In this theory, all matter is made from quarks and leptons. Particles interact with each other through the medium of the strong force, the electromagnetic force, the weak force, and the gravitational force. At high temperature, the theory sees the first three of these forces as an example of a single unified force.
The Standard Model of particle physics is a theory which describes three of the four known fundamental interactions between the elementary particles that make up all matter. It is a quantum field theory developed between 1970 and 1973 which is consistent with both quantum mechanics and special relativity. To date, almost all experimental tests of the three forces described by the Standard Model have agreed with its predictions. However, the Standard Model falls short of being a complete theory of fundamental interactions, primarily because of its lack of inclusion of gravity, the fourth known fundamental interaction, but also because of the large number of numerical parameters (such as masses and coupling constants) that must be put "by hand" into the theory (rather than being derived from first principles).
In physics, the dynamics of both matter and energy in Nature is presently best understood in terms of the kinematics and interactions of fundamental particles. To date, science has managed to reduce the laws which seem to govern the behavior and interaction of all types of matter and energy we are aware of, to a small core of fundamental laws and theories. A major goal of physics is to find the 'common ground' that would unite all of these into one integrated model of everything, in which all the other laws we know of would be special cases, and from which the behavior of all matter and energy can be derived (at least in principle). "Details can be worked out if the situation is simple enough for us to make an approximation, which is almost never, but often we can understand more or less what is happening." (Feynman's lectures on Physics, Vol 1. 2-7)
Within this, the Standard Model is a grouping of two major theories – quantum
electroweak and quantum chromodynamics – which provides an internally
consistent theory describing interactions between all experimentally observed particles. Technically, quantum field theory provides the mathematical
framework for the Standard Model. The Standard Model describes each type of particle in terms of a mathematical
For ease of description, the Standard Model can be divided into three parts – covering particles of matter, force mediating particles, and the Higgs boson.
The matter particles described by the Standard Model all have an intrinsic property known as 'spin' whose value is determined to be 1/2. In Standard Model terms, this means that all matter particles are fermions. For this reason, they follow the Pauli exclusion principle in accordance with the spin-statistics theorem, and it is this which causes their 'material' quality.[citation needed] Apart from their antiparticle partners, a total of twelve different types of matter particles are known and accounted for by the Standard Model. Six of these are classified as quarks (up, down, strange, charm, top and bottom), and the other six as leptons (electron, muon, tau, and their corresponding neutrinos).
| Generation 1 | Generation 2 | Generation 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarks | Up |
![]() |
Charm |
![]() |
Top |
![]() |
| Down |
![]() |
Strange |
![]() |
Bottom |
![]() |
|
| Leptons | Electron Neutrino |
![]() |
Muon Neutrino |
![]() |
Tau Neutrino |
![]() |
| Electron | ![]() |
Muon | ![]() |
Tau |
![]() |
|
Matter particles (as do mediating particles) also carry various charges which make them susceptible to the fundamental forces, which are in turn mediated as described in the next subsection.
Pairs from each group (one up-type quark, one down-type quark, a down-type lepton and its corresponding neutrino) form what is known as a 'generation'. The corresponding particles between each generation are identical to each other, with the exception of their mass and a property known as their flavor.
Forces in physics are the ways that particles interact and influence each other. At a macro level, for example, the electromagnetic force allows particles to interact with, and via magnetic fields, and the force of gravitation allows two particles with mass to attract one another in accordance with Newton's Law of Gravitation. The standard model explains such forces as resulting from matter particles exchanging other particles, known as force-mediating particles. When a force-mediating particle is exchanged, at a macro level the effect is equivalent to a force influencing both of them, and the particle is therefore said to have mediated (i.e., been the agent of) that force. Force-mediating particles are believed to be the reason why the forces and interactions between particles observed in the laboratory and in the universe exist.
The known force-mediating particles described by the Standard Model also all have spin (as did matter particles), but in their case, the value of the spin is 1, meaning that all force-mediating particles are bosons. As a result, they do not follow the Pauli Exclusion Principle. The different types of force mediating particles are described below.
The interactions between all the particles described by the Standard Model are summarized in the illustration immediately above and to the right.
| Electromagnetic Force | Weak Nuclear Force | Strong Nuclear Force | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photon | γ | W+, W-, and Z Gauge Bosons |
W + , W -
, Z |
Gluons | g |
The Higgs particle is a hypothetical massive scalar elementary particle predicted by the Standard Model, and the only fundamental particle predicted by that model which has not fully been observed as yet. This is partly because it requires an exceptionally large amount of energy to create and observe under laboratory circumstances. It has no intrinsic spin, and thus (like the force-mediating particles) is also classified as a boson.
The Higgs Boson plays a unique role in the Standard Model, and a key role in explaining the origins of the mass of other elementary particles, in particular the difference between the massless photon and the very heavy W and Z bosons. Elementary particle masses, and the differences between electromagnetism (caused by the photon) and the weak force (caused by the W and Z bosons), are critical to many aspects of the structure of microscopic (and hence macroscopic) matter; thus, if it is proven to exist, the Higgs boson has an enormous effect on the world around us.
As of 2007, no experiment has directly detected the existence of the Higgs boson, but there is some indirect evidence for it. It is hoped that upon the completion of the Large Hadron Collider, experiments conducted at CERN would bring experimental evidence confirming the existence for the particle.
This table is based in part on data gathered by the Particle Data Group (QuarksPDF (54.8 KiB)).
| Generation 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermion (left-handed) |
Symbol | Electric charge |
Weak isospin |
Hypercharge | Color charge * |
Mass ** | |
| Electron | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
511 keV | |
| Positron | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
511 keV | |
| Electron-neutrino | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
< 2 eV | |
| Up quark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 3 MeV *** | |
| Up antiquark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 3 MeV *** | |
| Down quark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 6 MeV *** | |
| Down antiquark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 6 MeV *** | |
| Generation 2 | |||||||
| Fermion (left-handed) |
Symbol | Electric charge |
Weak isospin |
Hypercharge | Color charge * |
Mass ** | |
| Muon | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
106 MeV | |
| Antimuon | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
106 MeV | |
| Muon-neutrino | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
< 2 eV | |
| Charm quark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 1.3 GeV | |
| Charm antiquark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 1.3 GeV | |
| Strange quark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 100 MeV | |
| Strange antiquark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 100 MeV | |
| Generation 3 | |||||||
| Fermion (left-handed) |
Symbol | Electric charge |
Weak isospin |
Hypercharge | Color charge * |
Mass ** | |
| Tau lepton | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.78 GeV | |
| Anti-tau lepton | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1.78 GeV | |
| Tau-neutrino | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
< 2 eV | |
| Top quark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
171 GeV | |
| Top antiquark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
171 GeV | |
| Bottom quark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 4.2 GeV | |
| Bottom antiquark | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
~ 4.2 GeV | |
Notes:
|
|||||||
The Standard Model predicted the existence of W and Z bosons, the gluon, the top quark and the charm quark before these particles had been observed. Their predicted properties were experimentally confirmed with good precision.
The Large Electron-Positron Collider at CERN tested various predictions about the decay of Z bosons, and found them confirmed.
To get an idea of the success of the Standard Model a comparison between the measured and the predicted values of some quantities are shown in the following table:
| Quantity | Measured (GeV) | SM prediction (GeV) |
|---|---|---|
| Mass of W boson | 80.398±0.025 | 80.3900±0.0180 |
| Mass of Z boson | 91.1876±0.0021 | 91.1874±0.0021 |
The Standard Model of particle physics has been empirically determined through experiments over the past fifty years. Currently the Standard Model predicts that there is one more particle to be discovered, the Higgs boson. One of the reasons for building the Large Hadron Collider is that the increase in energy is expected to make the Higgs observable. However, as of 2007 there are only indirect experimental indications for the existence of the Higgs boson and it can not be claimed to be found.
The Standard Model is as yet unable to explain
There has been a great deal of both theoretical and experimental research exploring whether the Standard Model could be extended into a complete theory of everything. This area of research is often described by
the term 'Beyond the Standard Model'. There are several facets of this
question. For example, one line of inquiry attempts to explore why there are seemingly so many unrelated parameters of the theory
– 29 in all. Research also focusses on the Hierarchy
problem (why the weak scale and Planck scale are so disparate), and attempts to
reconcile the emerging Standard Model of Cosmology with the Standard Model of particle physics. Many questions relate to the initial
conditions that led to the presently observed Universe. Examples include: Why is there a
matter/
Some claim that the vast majority of possible values for the parameters of the Standard Model are incompatible with the existence of life (see fine-tuned universe for more details).[2] According to arguments based on the anthropic principle, the Standard Model in our universe has the parameters it has because the universe has to be based upon parameters able to support life, in order for life to emerge able to ask the question. Since we know life has emerged, the choice of universal parameters is not unrestricted, but is ipso facto limited to being selected from choices of parameters where life could emerge. In theory (goes the anthropic principle) there could be a hundred billion universes where life as we know it could not emerge, because of having parameters where life as we know it was not possible. (See also Conditional probability.)
Some physicists argue that if we knew the String theory landscape of possible theories and prior distribution of these theories and also know the probability that any given theory will give rise to life, we would be able to make a statistical prediction of the parameters of the Standard Model.[2] Other physicists point out that it is difficult to see how you can predict the probability of life from any given theory. How can we know what kinds of life are possible?
| General subfields within physics |
|---|
| Classical mechanics · Electromagnetism · Thermodynamics · Statistical mechanics · Quantum mechanics · Relativity · High energy physics · Condensed matter physics · Atomic, molecular, and optical physics |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
Join the WikiAnswers Q&A community. Post a question or answer questions about "standard model" at WikiAnswers.
Copyrights:
![]() | Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Science Dictionary. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Standard Model". Read more |
Mentioned In: